The Moment
Ray J has filed a new lawsuit against Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner, alleging they weren’t victims of the 2007 sex tape release but architects of it. According to a civil complaint filed this week in Los Angeles County, he claims the tape was consensually filmed in 2003 and that by 2006 there were talks to release it with Kris overseeing the business side.
The filing goes further: Ray J says the Kardashians spent years pushing the idea that the tape was leaked against Kim’s will, and he alleges they later broke a settlement deal by revisiting the saga on TV. He cites an agreement in which Kim allegedly agreed to pay him $6 million and to stop referencing the tape on their show. He now seeks at least $1 million in damages tied to that alleged agreement.
Through their attorney, Alex Spiro, Kim and Kris reject Ray J’s claims and label the new suit frivolous. They previously sued him for defamation last month. The net effect? A years-old, generation-defining pop-culture story is back in court—and back in our feeds—just when you thought every last angle had been litigated on cable, streaming, and group chats.
#EXCLUSIVE 👀 Ray J is firing back at Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner with a lawsuit of his own after they sued him for defamation
Details: https://t.co/PnWL2RRJNC pic.twitter.com/ZxpNI5RyDe
— TMZ (@TMZ) November 13, 2025
The Take
Here’s what this sounds like to me: two different versions of the same origin story, both rewritten to serve the moment. If fame is high school, this is the yearbook committee fighting over the captions—only the captions are depositions and the votes are court rulings.
Ray J’s complaint taps an old nerve: who controlled the narrative and who profited. The Kardashians built an empire on polishing mess into mythology—sometimes with a wink. He’s arguing that the myth (“it leaked against her will”) is a business strategy, not a scar. They’re saying his new storytelling is the real hustle. And unlike social media spats, this one comes with exhibits and affidavits.
What’s hype vs. reality? The tape’s existence and release through a distributor in 2007—real. The behind-the-scenes decision-making—alleged, and now officially contested. The supposed $6 million settlement and a no-mention clause—also alleged, not confirmed by the Kardashian side. Until we see filings, dates, and signatures, it’s all courtroom chess and great TV fodder. But make no mistake: if any side truly breached a signed agreement, the paper trail won’t care about anyone’s reality-TV edit.
Receipts
Confirmed
- A civil lawsuit was filed by Ray J in Los Angeles County alleging the Kardashians were involved in the sex tape’s release (per newly filed court documents).
- Kim Kardashian and Ray J’s tape was commercially distributed by Vivid Entertainment in 2007 (publicly documented release).
- Attorney Alex Spiro, representing Kim and Kris, has publicly dismissed Ray J’s new lawsuit as frivolous (attorney statement).
- The Kardashians have discussed the tape on their Hulu series across multiple seasons (episodes aired 2022 onward).
Unverified / Alleged
- That Kim and Kris orchestrated the release and “exploitation” of the tape (Ray J’s allegation in the new complaint).
- That a prior settlement included a $6 million payment to Ray J and a bar on future references to the tape (alleged terms; not confirmed by the Kardashian side).
- That Kim, Kris, Ye, and Kendall violated such an agreement by mentioning the tape on the show (alleged breach).
- That parallels to racketeering statutes apply to their conduct (Ray J’s analogy in filings; not a charge).
Backstory (For Casual Readers)
Kim Kardashian and Ray J dated in the early 2000s. A sex tape they made surfaced and was released commercially in 2007. The tape’s fallout supercharged early interest in Kim at the exact moment her family’s reality footprint was taking shape, first on cable and later on streaming. Over the years, the saga’s been re-litigated in interviews, episodes, and Instagram Lives, with each side painting the origin story a little differently—sometimes denying orchestration, sometimes hinting at savvy management. It has long been the Kardashian ur-myth: fame’s messy spark.
What’s Next
Expect a brisk round of motions. Given the defamation suit from last month and this new countersuit-style filing, early hearings could determine what documents become public and how quickly. Watch for:
- Whether the court compels or allows disclosure of any alleged settlement agreement and payment records.
- Potential anti-SLAPP motions tied to speech on a TV show (a common move in cases touching public statements).
- Any updated statements from Kim, Kris, or Ray J—or a pivot to “no comment” while the lawyers handle it.
- Whether references to the tape vanish from future episodes if a no-mention clause actually exists and is enforceable.
Bottom line: if there’s real paper here, we’ll see it. And if there isn’t, this could burn bright and fast, like so many celebrity lawsuits that feel tailor-made for the trailer but not for trial.
Sources
• Los Angeles County civil complaint filed by Ray J (November 2025).
• Statement from attorney Alex Spiro representing Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner (November 2025).
• Hulu — The Kardashians, episodes referencing the sex tape storyline (2022–2024).
• Vivid Entertainment distribution of Kim Kardashian Superstar (2007).
Question for readers: Does this fight change how you see the tape’s role in the Kardashian rise—or is it just another chapter in a story you already made peace with?
Comments