Brussels investigates the ASJUBI40 pension cuts

Brussels investigates the ASJUBI40 pension cuts


ASJUBI40 speaks in the European Parliament and continues its complaint in pensions

Asjubi40’s struggle for pensions exceeds another test in Brussels: And now what?

After the historical step given by the Pensioners Association ASJUBI40 (@asjubi40), that the September 24 He got him European Parliament request Committee He kept his claim against Spain open (Petition No. 0424/2025), the Eurocamara has already initiated the procedures To prosecute perpetual pension cuts, suffered by anticipated retirees with long contribution races.

As confirmed Juan Ignacio Navas Marqués, founding partner of Navas & Cusí (office that takes the case in Brussels), the European Commission has already received the “commission to carry out a Preliminary research On this matter. “It must be remembered that the European Parliament has urged to open a dialogue with the Spanish government, and that, according to Navas, is” practically the structured dialogue established in disciplinary procedures against a state member”.

The procedure for Examine Spanish legislation regarding these retirements It has already been launched, as detailed by a Letter from the president of the Petition Committee of the European Parliament, sent to office which represents the interests of ASJUBI40, in turn defends 900,000 pensioners Spaniards

ASJUBI40 COMMISSION LETTER

“The Petition Commission has examined our request and declared it admissible, since the issue raised enters within the areas of action of the European Union. Therefore, it has asked the European Commission to carry out a preliminary investigation on this matter. Taking into account the matter in question, the petition has also been referred to the Commission of Employment and Social Affairs (ERI) of the European Parliament,” Asjubi40 to 65 and more.

In addition to the legal representation, ASJUBI40 has in Europe with the support of several games in the Eurocamara, among them, Compromís, for whom “the penalty is totally unfair and unjustified, According to social pillars and European regulations “, in the words of Vicent Marzà, who urged the request for requests to keep investigation into this situation open.

What does an open petition mean in the Eurocamara?

When such a request remains open, it means that the Theme is still alive in the European Parliament Agenda. This allows, in the future, you can resume for a new debate, Organize a visiting mission, celebrate a audition or a working group (Workshop), either even Raise one Resolution proposal, in accordance with the provisions of European regulations.

In addition, in the request document of the petition (Sir), which the petitioners receive after adoption, the points discussed are collected.

As for usual actions, The Navas & Cusí Office cites the following:

-Per information to the European Commission.

-Transmit the petition to the competent committee (in this case, EFP) for information purposes.

-Charts the Government of Spain requesting explanations.

As for legal deadlines to have news On the development of this preliminary research, members of the ASJUBI40 committee emphasize that “it is difficult to know exactly, since it depends on each matter (and subject), on each state.”

ASJUBI40 in Brussels
ASJUBI40 committee and legal team, at the headquarters of the European Parliament of Brussels.

Does EU right to unify social security?

As explained in his letter the president of the request for requests, The right of the European Union In matters of social security “Coordination foresee, and not harmonization, social security systems.”

That is, EU legislation It does not limit the power of the Member States to organize their social security systems and, in the absence of harmonization at the EU level, corresponds to the Member States to determine, In its legislation, the conditions of granting the Social Security benefits, as well as its amount and its concession period.

Despite these Peros, They point out that the solution of the claim of ASJUBI40 could still have a long way to go, the Eurocamara warns that, in the exercise of their powers, “Member States must fulfill the right of the European Union.”





Source link

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *