The Moment
David Geffen, the billionaire media and music mogul, is about to be legally single again. According to recent court filings, he and his estranged husband, model David Armstrong (who has also gone by Donovan Michaels), are set to have their marital status officially terminated on November 24.
That means the state will say, “You’re no longer married,” but it absolutely does not mean the drama is over. The money conversation – spousal support, who gets what property, and who pays whose lawyers – is still being hammered out and will be finalized later.
In earlier filings described in public reports, Geffen has essentially argued he’s been generous, claiming he’s already paid Armstrong plenty and is even covering the tab for Armstrong’s New York City penthouse. Armstrong, for his part, has told the court he believes Geffen is hiding the true size of his wealth to keep spousal support low.
Armstrong has also accused Geffen of treating him like “a living social experiment” and a “trophy” to show off to rich friends – claims Armstrong made in court papers and a civil lawsuit he filed in July, alleging exploitation. That separate lawsuit was dropped in October, but the divorce case is still very much alive.
So, the marriage is ending quickly on paper. The untangling of billionaire-level money? Not so fast.
The Take
I’ll be honest: nothing about this story is subtle. Older billionaire. Much younger model husband. No prenup. A marriage that barely makes it to year two. If you tried to pitch this as a limited series, you’d be told it’s too on the nose.
What we’re really watching isn’t just a divorce; it’s a power gap on parade. When someone with vast money and cultural clout marries someone with far less, the relationship can start to look like a project. Armstrong’s “living social experiment” line is harsh, but you can see why it landed; he’s painting a picture where love, lifestyle, and status all get mashed into one blurry arrangement.
From Geffen’s side, the message is basically: I paid, I provided, what more do you want? From Armstrong’s, it’s: you controlled everything, including the money, and now you’re using that to walk away clean. Two totally different versions of the same relationship – and the court has to sort through the receipts, literally and metaphorically.
This is why the lack of a prenup matters so much. A prenup is like a fire extinguisher in a very expensive kitchen – you hope you never need it, but if things catch, you’re glad it’s there. Without one, all the feelings, ego, and resentment get poured straight into the money fight. Every accusation suddenly has a dollar sign attached.
And then there’s the optics. Geffen is one of the most powerful gay men in entertainment history; Armstrong is a younger model who moved in a very different orbit until they got together. When a marriage like that blows up in under two years, it feeds every cynical stereotype about rich men and pretty partners – which is unfair to everyone involved but inevitable in the court of public opinion.
At the end of the day, this looks less like a love story gone wrong and more like a high-end business partnership collapsing, complete with NDAs, property agreements, and carefully worded filings. The romance is long gone; we’re in spreadsheet territory now.
Receipts
Confirmed:
- Court records in Los Angeles County show David Geffen and David Armstrong’s marital status is scheduled to be terminated on November 24, making them legally single while financial issues continue.
- Filings referenced in public reporting indicate there is a written agreement between the two men regarding certain property and partnership terms.
- It is confirmed they married in 2023 and did not have a prenuptial agreement, and Geffen filed for divorce shortly before their second anniversary.
- Armstrong filed a separate civil lawsuit in July accusing Geffen of exploiting him; that lawsuit was voluntarily dropped in October, according to court records.
Unverified / Alleged:
- Armstrong’s claim that Geffen treated him as “a living social experiment” and a trophy is his characterization from legal filings, not an established finding by a court.
- Armstrong’s allegation that Geffen is hiding wealth to minimize spousal support is also his legal position, not something a judge has ruled on.
- Geffen’s claimed level of financial support to Armstrong (including how much he has paid and what properties he’s funding) comes from his side’s account in the divorce context and has not been independently detailed in public records.
Sources: Los Angeles County Superior Court divorce and civil case records (November 2025); public reporting by a major celebrity news outlet on November 19, 2025.
Backstory (For Casual Readers)
If you haven’t followed David Geffen lately, here’s the quick rewind. Geffen made his fortune in music and movies – think record labels, blockbuster films, and eventual billionaire status. He’s also been famously private about his personal life, even as he became one of the most powerful figures in entertainment.
David Armstrong, much younger than Geffen, is a model who has worked under the name Donovan Michaels. The two surprised a lot of people when it emerged they had quietly married in 2023. Because of the large age gap and the power imbalance, their relationship was always going to draw curiosity, but they largely stayed out of the day-to-day gossip cycle – until the divorce filings hit.
Once the split went public, the story shifted fast from “unexpected marriage” to “very expensive uncoupling,” especially when it became clear there was no prenup and both men were accusing the other of bad behavior in court documents.
What’s Next
In the short term, the headline is simple: come November 24, they’ll no longer be legally married. Don’t confuse that with “everything is settled,” though. The real work now is financial – final decisions on spousal support, property division, and attorney fees.
We may see a confidential settlement, which is common when a huge fortune is involved and both sides would like a little less public airing of their business. Watch for sealed filings or notices of settlement in the court docket rather than splashy public statements.
Also worth watching: whether either man decides to do a controlled, on-the-record version of events after things wrap – a profile, a sit-down, or even a carefully worded social post. When there’s this much money and resentment swirling, someone usually wants the “last word,” even if it’s behind carefully polished glass.
Until then, this case is another loud reminder that in relationships with big power gaps, the breakup rarely ends at “we’re just not right for each other.” It ends in itemized lists, valuations, and strangers in robes deciding how much the relationship was worth.
Your turn: In a huge power-imbalance relationship like this – massive fortune on one side, much less on the other – what do you think is truly “fair” when the marriage ends?
Comments