Prince William, we’re told, wanted Prince Andrew banished after that now-infamous 2019 BBC “Newsnight” sit-down. If true, it’s the rare royal moment where common sense beat deference-brand protection over blood ties.

But let’s separate the palace whispering from the public record: some of this is confirmed history; some is fresh, unverified heat. Proceed with caution.

The Moment

Royal author Russell Myers says William was “absolutely adamant” that Andrew be pushed out of both public and private royal life after the 2019 interview, where Andrew attempted to justify his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The claim surfaced this week in a published interview with Myers.

According to those accounts, William backed his father’s leadership to take decisive action. Buckingham Palace, per reporting, did not offer immediate comment.

Prince William and King Charles III speak during the Countdown to COP30 at the Natural History Museum.
Photo: Page Six

There are also new, tabloid-level claims that Andrew was arrested on Feb. 19 and accused of sharing confidential travel information with Epstein during Andrew’s tenure as the U.K.’s trade envoy (2001-2011). At the time of writing, we have not seen an on-record statement from law enforcement confirming an arrest or charges. Treat that as unverified until official confirmation arrives.

The Take

This isn’t just family drama; it’s crisis management at a 1,000-year-old firm. The monarchy is a soft-power brand, and Andrew’s “Newsnight” performance was like setting off a flare in a fireworks factory. William, urging a hard reset? That tracks.

Still, “banish” is more Shakespeare than statute. The real levers are duties, titles, and public funding-and those levers were already pulled. After 2019, Andrew stepped back; in 2022, he lost military affiliations and the use of HRH in an official sense. That’s not gossip; that’s on paper.

“In the Firm, accountability looks like a calendar-no walkabouts, no uniforms, no balcony.”

As for the new arrest chatter: until police go on record, it’s noise. Important noise, potentially, but still noise. The victims of Epstein deserve accuracy over adrenaline. The adult read here is simple: wait for documents, not whispers.

Receipts

Confirmed

  • Prince Andrew’s 2019 “Newsnight” interview aired nationally, where he defended aspects of his prior association with Jeffrey Epstein and drew widespread criticism.
  • Buckingham Palace announced on Jan. 13, 2022, that Andrew’s military affiliations and royal patronages were returned to the Crown and he would no longer use HRH in an official capacity.
  • Court filings in February 2022 confirm that Virginia Giuffre and Prince Andrew reached a civil settlement; the amount was not officially disclosed. (Giuffre is alive.)

Reported/Unverified

  • William urged the late Queen and King Charles III to “banish” Andrew following the 2019 interview – a claim made by royal author Russell Myers in a published interview, not corroborated by the Palace.
  • Andrew was “arrested” on Feb. 19 in connection with the alleged sharing of confidential travel information and related investigations – reported in tabloids; no on-record police confirmation seen at the time of writing.
  • Allegations that Epstein trafficked a woman to the U.K. for Andrew’s sexual purposes remain under investigation in various reports; there has been no criminal conviction of Andrew on such claims.

Backstory (For the Casual Reader)

Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, served as a U.K. trade envoy from 2001 to 2011 and maintained a friendship with Jeffrey Epstein that persisted after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. In November 2019, Andrew’s BBC interview, in which he defended parts of that association, ignited public backlash. He stepped back from royal duties days later. In 2022, Buckingham Palace removed his military affiliations and HRH style; that same year, he settled a U.S. civil lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre without admitting liability. Since then, he has not returned to frontline public duties and remains a lightning rod for the monarchy’s reputation management.

Your turn: If you were running “The Firm,” would you favor a quiet, permanent sidelining-or a clear, public line on consequences and why?

Sources: BBC “Newsnight” broadcast with Prince Andrew (Nov. 2019); Buckingham Palace public statement on Prince Andrew’s titles and roles (Jan. 13, 2022); publicly filed U.S. court documents noting settlement in Giuffre v. Prince Andrew (Feb. 2022); published interview comments from royal author Russell Myers (Feb. 25, 2026).


Reaction On This Story

You May Also Like

Copy link