Only in our era: a royal, an alleged massage swap, and a paper trail with more redactions than a spy novel.
Newly unsealed court records say a Brazilian Epstein survivor told the FBI in 2020 she massaged Prince Andrew at Jeffrey Epstein’s New York townhouse – and that he then massaged her back, clothed. Photos in the files appear to rhyme with her account but don’t conclusively identify her.
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: this is not a new scandal so much as a sharper focus. And focus is rarely kind to the House of “Nothing to See Here.”
The Moment
According to FBI interview notes unsealed this week, a Brazilian woman – now a London-based swimwear designer – told agents she visited Epstein’s Manhattan home around 2009-2010 and encountered Prince Andrew in the kitchen with a young woman who “wasn’t American.”
She says Epstein asked her to massage Andrew; Epstein briefly left, returned with a camera, and after she finished, Andrew allegedly told her “it was her turn,” massaging her back, shoulders, waist, and hands. She asserts everyone remained clothed during the exchange.
In separate unsealed materials, another woman – an American who reported doing paid massage work for Epstein in the 1990s and 2000s – told the FBI she occasionally massaged Andrew at Epstein’s request and once gave Donald Trump a foot massage on a flight. Trump has publicly denied any wrongdoing or prior knowledge of Epstein’s abuses.
The Take
Let’s separate heat from light. A clothed massage is not, on its face, a crime. But context matters, and context here is a neon billboard: Epstein’s home, Epstein’s camera, Epstein’s power. Even benign acts curdle under that roof.
As for the photos of Andrew crouched over an unidentified woman: they’re suggestive, not dispositive. The details overlap – location, posture, mention of a waist massage – but overlap isn’t proof. The public deserves precision, not a Rorschach test.
Big picture, this is the familiar collision between proximity and judgment. Andrew’s story keeps shrinking down to a single, stubborn question: Why were you there – and what made you stay? It’s like watching someone insist the stove isn’t hot while standing in an oven mitt aisle.
In the Epstein universe, even a ‘harmless’ massage reads like a flare gun.
Receipts
Confirmed:
- FBI interview summaries (FD-302s) from 2020 describe a Brazilian woman alleging a mutual, clothed massage with Prince Andrew at Epstein’s New York townhouse.
- Separate FBI interview notes describe another woman saying she massaged Andrew at Epstein’s request and once massaged Donald Trump’s feet on a flight; she reported routine payment for Epstein-related work.
- Public archival footage places Andrew at Epstein’s Manhattan residence in December 2010.
- Donald Trump publicly stated in 2019 that he was “not a fan” of Epstein and denied wrongdoing.
Unverified/Reported:
- Whether the Brazilian woman is the unidentified person seen in photos of Andrew crouched over a woman remains unconfirmed.
- The precise date of the alleged massage exchange (reported as circa 2009-2010) is not established in public filings beyond the witness’s account.
- Prince Andrew’s office has not provided a comment responding to these newly unsealed notes as of publication.
The latest dump of Epstein Files (March 2026) just revealed a chilling testimony from a Brazilian model.
She describes a “massage swap” with Prince Andrew at Epstein’s New York townhouse.
While the world focused on Virginia Giuffre, this witness provides a play-by-play of the… pic.twitter.com/DiA6kVoowl
— 🇬🇧King 🇬🇧 (@King0243_PJC) March 8, 2026
Backstory (For the Casual Reader)
Prince Andrew’s ties to Epstein have dogged him for years. He was photographed and filmed visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse in 2010, after Epstein’s first conviction. In 2022, Andrew settled a New York civil lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre with no admission of liability and has largely stepped back from public duties since. Epstein died in federal custody in 2019; his long shadow persists because new records keep surfacing, reframing old questions with fresh specifics.
Your turn: Do these unsealed notes meaningfully change your view of Andrew’s judgment – or is this just more smoke without a new fire?
Sources: Unsealed federal court records (Southern District of New York), release March 2026: FBI FD-302 interview summaries dated 2020 concerning witnesses referencing Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein; Public civil court filings in New York documenting the February 2022 settlement of Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit against Prince Andrew (no admission of liability); Archival press-pool footage documenting Prince Andrew at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, December 2010; Official White House press remarks, July 2019, in which Donald Trump addressed questions about Jeffrey Epstein and denied wrongdoing.
Comments